Prone versus Supine Position during Surgery for Supracondylar Humeral Fractures
Author(s) -
Guler Olcay,
Mutlu Serhat,
Isyar Mehmet,
Mutlu Harun,
Cerci Halis,
Mahirogullari Mahir
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.457
H-Index - 40
eISSN - 2309-4990
pISSN - 1022-5536
DOI - 10.1177/1602400209
Subject(s) - medicine , supine position , percutaneous pinning , surgery , prone position , reduction (mathematics) , percutaneous , anesthesia , humerus , geometry , mathematics
Purpose To compare the supine versus prone position in closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for supracondylar humeral fractures in children in terms of patient characteristics and outcome.Methods Records of 25 girls and 31 boys aged 4 to 9 (mean, 6.7) years who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning in the prone (n=27) or supine (n=29) position each by one experienced surgeon for supracondylar extension type-3 humeral fractures were reviewed.Results The prone and supine groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics and outcome, except that anaesthesia duration was shorter in surgery performed in the supine position (46.7 vs. 37.2 minutes, p<0.001).Conclusion In surgery for supracondylar humeral fractures in children, patient position affected only the duration of anaesthesia.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom