Open AccessDifferences of expected intervention effects between participant-led and facilitator-led preventive care services in Japan
Author(s) -
Shan Yun,
Risa Takashima,
Kazuki Yoshida,
Daisuke Sawamura,
Takao Inoue,
Shinya Sakai
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
hong kong journal of occupational therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.301
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 1876-4398
pISSN - 1569-1861
DOI - 10.1177/15691861211022986
Subject(s) - facilitator , psychological intervention , medicine , occupational therapy , analysis of covariance , intervention (counseling) , gerontology , physical therapy , test (biology) , psychology , nursing , social psychology , machine learning , computer science , paleontology , biology
Objective To examine the effect of different management methods on the effectiveness of care preventive programmes for community-dwelling older adults.Methods This study comprised two facilitator-led (FL) and one participant-led (PL) preventive care classes in Japan. All participants received the intervention for approximately 12 weeks. Functional assessments, occupational dysfunctions, and subjective health were measured before and after the interventions. A two-way mixed design analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was adopted to examine the effect of the interventions, adjusted for previous experiences with preventive care services. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.Results Fourteen participants in the PL group (76.64 ± 6.48 years, 92.9% women) and 29 participants in the FL group (76.55 ± 5.75 years, 75.9% women) were included in the statistical analysis. ANCOVA showed significant group × time interaction effects in the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST), the Timed Up & Go (TUG), occupational deprivation of the Classification and Assessment of Occupational Dysfunction Scale, and self-rated health. Simple main effect tests showed that the TUG decreased significantly in the PL group, while occupational deprivation and self-rated health scores improved significantly. In contrast, FTSST scores significantly improved in the FL group.Conclusion PL-type management may be more appropriate for preventing social isolation and withdrawal, while FL-type management may be more appropriate for preventing physical frailty. Selecting not only adequate programmes but also an appropriate management type that matches the service purpose can help provide more effective care preventive services.