z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Assessing the Impact of Micronutrient Intervention Programs Implemented under Special Circumstances—Meeting Report
Author(s) -
Saskia de Pee,
Paul Spiegel,
Klaus Kraemer,
Caroline Wilkinson,
Oleg Bilukha,
Andrew Seal,
Kathy Macías,
Allison Oman,
Ahmed Baba Fall,
Ray Yip,
Juan Pablo PeñaRosas,
Keith P. West,
Stanley Zlotkin,
Martin W. Bloem
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
food and nutrition bulletin
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.649
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1564-8265
pISSN - 0379-5721
DOI - 10.1177/156482651103200311
Subject(s) - micronutrient , psychological intervention , medicine , environmental health , intervention (counseling) , refugee , psychiatry , archaeology , pathology , history
and Objective The World Food Programme and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees organized a meeting of experts to discuss evaluation of micronutrient interventions under special circumstances, such as emergency and refugee situations.Results Multimicronutrient interventions for groups with higher needs may include home fortification products for young children or supplements for pregnant and lactating women. The choice of preparation should be guided by target group needs, evidence of efficacy of a product or its compounds, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness. Different designs can be used to assess whether an intervention has the desired impact. First, program implementation and adherence must be ascertained. Then, impact on micronutrient status can be assessed, but design options are often limited by logistic challenges, available budget, security issues, and ethical and practical issues regarding nonintervention or placebo groups. Under these conditions, a plausibility design using pre- and postintervention cross-sectional surveys, a prospective cohort study, or a step-wedge design, which enrolls groups as they start receiving the intervention, should be considered. Post hoc comparison of groups with different adherence levels may also be useful. Hemoglobin is often selected as an impact indicator because it is easily measured and tends to respond to change in micronutrient status, especially iron. However, it is not a very specific indicator of micronutrient status, because it is also influenced by inflammation, parasitic infestation, physiological status (age, pregnancy), altitude, and disorders such as thalassemia and sickle cell disease.Conclusion Given the constraints described above, replicability of impact in different contexts is key to the validation of micronutrient interventions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here