z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Integrating progress files into the academic process
Author(s) -
J.G.B. Haigh
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
active learning in higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.242
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1741-2625
pISSN - 1469-7874
DOI - 10.1177/1469787407086747
Subject(s) - categorization , process (computing) , perspective (graphical) , context (archaeology) , higher education , computer science , ideal (ethics) , object (grammar) , engineering ethics , knowledge management , data science , sociology , mathematics education , psychology , epistemology , engineering , political science , artificial intelligence , philosophy , biology , operating system , law , paleontology
A literature review of published case studies reporting progress file implementation was conducted with the intent of discovering how this is being interpreted and implemented in higher education institutions. The three studies found were analysed using an ideal type categorization developed by Clegg and Bradley (2006), that is, professional, academic or employment. All three case studies are examples of academics learning through experience about the process of personal development planning and how this integrates with current educational provision. As this is not a static process, an activity theory perspective may be a more useful framework to research how this understanding develops in a particular context. Currently the progress file is a contested object, which has not yet fulfilled its potential to place the student and their individual learning needs at the centre of the educational process

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom