z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Preventing Rater Biases in 360-Degree Feedback by Forcing Choice
Author(s) -
Anna Brown,
Ilke Inceoglu,
Yin Lin
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
organizational research methods
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.901
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1552-7425
pISSN - 1094-4281
DOI - 10.1177/1094428116668036
Subject(s) - psychology , likert scale , social psychology , common method variance , response bias , inter rater reliability , construct (python library) , confirmatory factor analysis , two alternative forced choice , convergent validity , item response theory , structural equation modeling , construct validity , psychometrics , statistics , econometrics , rating scale , cognitive psychology , mathematics , clinical psychology , developmental psychology , computer science , internal consistency , programming language
We examined the effects of response biases on 360-degree feedback using a large sample (N=4,675) of organizational appraisal data. Sixteen competencies were assessed by peers, bosses and subordinates of 922 managers, as well as self-assessed, using the Inventory of Management Competencies (IMC) administered in two formats – Likert scale and multidimensional forced choice. Likert ratings were subject to strong response biases, making even theoretically unrelated competencies correlate highly. Modeling a latent common method factor, which represented non-uniform distortions similar to those of “ideal-employee” factor in both self- and other assessments, improved validity of competency scores as evidenced by meaningful second-order factor structures, better inter-rater agreement, and better convergent correlations with an external personality measure. Forced-choice rankings modelled with Thurstonian IRT yielded as good construct and convergent validities as the bias-controlled Likert ratings, and slightly better rater agreement. We suggest that the mechanism for these enhancements is finer differentiation between behaviors in comparative judgements, and advocate the operational use of the multidimensional forced-choice response format as an effective bias prevention method

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom