Resource Utilization in Hospitalized Patients With Cancer From Hospice Decision to Discharge and Provider-Type Differences
Author(s) -
Shah Ruchi J.,
Korenstein Deborah,
Flynn Jessica R.,
Koo Douglas J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
american journal of hospice and palliative medicine®
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.803
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1938-2715
pISSN - 1049-9091
DOI - 10.1177/1049909119889289
Subject(s) - medicine , proxy (statistics) , retrospective cohort study , end of life care , resource use , quality of life (healthcare) , hospice care , cohort , family medicine , health care , cancer , palliative care , emergency medicine , nursing , natural resource economics , machine learning , computer science , economics , economic growth
Aggressive resource utilization for patients with cancer at the end of life has been associated with poor outcomes for patients and their families. To our knowledge, no previous studies have characterized resource utilization as a proxy for quality end-of-life care in hospitalized patients awaiting discharge to hospice by physician and advanced practice providers (APPs). We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine resource utilization and the quality metrics for end-of-life care in patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from the date of hospice decision to discharge. Patients under the care of APP teams were less likely to receive laboratory testing (50% vs 59%, P = .046) and received fewer tests than those with house staff teams, though performance on end-of-life quality metrics was similar. Our findings suggest APPs may improve quality of end-of-life care by avoiding unnecessary or aggressive measures compared to house staff.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom