Evaluation of three Methods for Measurement of Hemoglobin and Calculated Hemoglobin Variables with the ADVIA 120® and ADVIA 2120® Systems in Goats
Author(s) -
Natali Bauer,
Andreas Moritz
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.529
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1943-4936
pISSN - 1040-6387
DOI - 10.1177/104063870802000509
Subject(s) - hemoglobin , linear regression , hematology analyzer , chromatography , chemistry , mathematics , medicine , statistics
The present study investigated 3 methods of hemoglobin (Hb) determination in goats using the ADVIA 120 and ADVIA 2120 systems. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid anticoagulated caprine blood samples (n = 40 goats) were subjected to Hb determination via the cyanmethemoglobin methods in both instruments and a novel, cyanide-free, colorimetric method with the ADVIA 2120. Statistical analysis of the data included a linear regression, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland-Altman diagram. Colorimetric Hb results determined with both analyzers had excellent correlation ( r = 0.98); however, a mean proportional bias of −19.1% was present in comparison to the reference method. There also was excellent agreement between cellular Hb concentrations when measured with both analyzers ( r = 0.96), and the constant bias was close to zero. However, imprecision was higher compared to colorimetric methods. Excellent to fair agreement was evident for all calculated erythrocyte and Hb variables. Because of the excellent correlation between the ADVIA 120 and ADVIA 2120, the cyanide-free method of Hb determination could be used with caprine blood specimens; however, the proportional bias must be considered.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom