z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Controlling Seizures in Children: Diazepam or Midazolam? Systematic Review
Author(s) -
Doshi D
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
hong kong journal of emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.145
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 2309-5407
pISSN - 1024-9079
DOI - 10.1177/102490791001700219
Subject(s) - medicine , diazepam , midazolam , anesthesia , tolerability , benzodiazepine , buccal administration , onset of action , nasal administration , adverse effect , pharmacology , sedation , receptor
Diazepam is commonly used to treat acute childhood seizures, but difficulty gaining intravenous access and variability of absorption after rectal administration can limit its efficacy. Midazolam is a water soluble benzodiazepine that has a rapid onset of action after intranasal or buccal administration and provides an alternative to diazepam in the control of acute childhood seizures. Methods A literature search was performed to identify papers comparing the efficacy and tolerability of midazolam and diazepam in the management of childhood seizures. Results Intranasal or buccal midazolam are at least as effective as rectal or intravenous diazepam in controlling acute childhood seizures. In all robust studies reporting a significant difference, time to gain seizure control was shorter in patients treated with midazolam than those treated with diazepam, predominantly due to shorter drug administration time. The incidence of seizure recurrence was lower in patients treated with midazolam than diazepam. Respiratory depression was uncommon in both groups. Conclusion Intranasal or buccal midazolam provides a safe, effective and acceptable alternative to intravenous or rectal diazepam in the management of acute childhood seizures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here