Open AccessManagement of Foreign Bodies in Throat: An Emergency Department's Perspective
Author(s) -
Chiu HS,
Chung CH
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
hong kong journal of emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.145
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 2309-5407
pISSN - 1024-9079
DOI - 10.1177/102490790200900302
Subject(s) - medicine , emergency department , foreign body , specialty , throat , laryngoscopy , radiological weapon , endoscopy , ambulatory , population , foreign bodies , medical emergency , general surgery , emergency medicine , surgery , intubation , nursing , family medicine , environmental health
Objectives To review the share of emergency physicians and surgeons in the removal of foreign bodies in throat, and to revisit the concept of home observation and elective endoscopic examination for this group of patients. Design Retrospective study for a five month period. Setting Public general hospital with emergency and surgical departments. Population All patients attending the emergency department from 1st January 1999 to 31st May 1999 with a diagnosis or chief complaint of foreign body in throat or foreign body ingestion. Main outcome measures Success rate of foreign body retrieval, method of removal, specialty and patient outcome. Results 79.8% of the foreign bodies were fish bones. Eighty‐nine percent foreign bodies was removed by direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department, 6.7% by emergency physicians in the endoscopy unit as outpatients and 4.3% by surgeons after admission. Conclusion In the absence of frank clinical or radiological sign, a short period of home observation before proceeding to elective oesophagogastro‐duodenoscopy (OGD) assessment may be helpful as well as cost‐effective. This policy screens out some unnecessary instrumentation, without increasing the rate of complications. As emergency physicians remove the majority of foreign bodies, their expanded involvement on an ambulatory basis is both reasonable and feasible.