Borderline personality disorder and the ethics of risk management: The action/consequence model
Author(s) -
Dan Warrender
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
nursing ethics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.85
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1477-0989
pISSN - 0969-7330
DOI - 10.1177/0969733016679467
Subject(s) - beneficence , ethical dilemma , action (physics) , intervention (counseling) , borderline personality disorder , personality , psychology , medicine , dilemma , psychotherapist , nursing , psychiatry , clinical psychology , social psychology , autonomy , political science , law , philosophy , physics , epistemology , quantum mechanics
Patients with borderline personality disorder are frequent users of inpatient mental health units, with inpatient crisis intervention often used based on the risk of suicide. However, this can present an ethical dilemma for nursing and medical staff, with these clinician responses shifting between the moral principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, dependent on the outcomes of the actions of containing or tolerating risk. This article examines the use of crisis intervention through moral duties, intentions and consequences, culminating in an action/consequence model of risk management, used to explore potential outcomes. This model may be useful in measuring adherence and violation of the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence and therefore an aid to clinical decision making.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom