z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Associated Mortality of Liberal Fluid Administration in Sepsis
Author(s) -
Johnson Mathew R.,
Reed T. Patrick,
Lowe Denise K.,
Cahoon William D.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of pharmacy practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.407
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1531-1937
pISSN - 0897-1900
DOI - 10.1177/0897190018759857
Subject(s) - medicine , resuscitation , sepsis , septic shock , intravascular volume status , intensive care medicine , shock (circulatory) , surviving sepsis campaign , fluid replacement , anesthesia , hemodynamics , severe sepsis
Fluid resuscitation, to restore intravascular volume and improve oxygen delivery, is a crucial step in early resuscitation efforts of patients with sepsis or septic shock. The 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines suggest the use of dynamic versus static measures of fluid responsiveness and fluid resuscitation with at least 30 mL/kg of intravenous crystalloid within the first 3 hours followed by fluid administration if hemodynamic factors continue to improve. Despite these recommendations, risks to this practice may exist as multiple studies have demonstrated an association between a positive fluid balance and/or administration of large fluid volume and increase in mortality. These studies are limited by variations in their methodologic design; therefore, cause and effect cannot yet be determined. Future multicenter, randomized, controlled studies that evaluate fluid balance and fluid volume need to be conducted to clarify the role of fluid administration to patients with sepsis to maximize benefits and minimize risk.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom