z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Critical Theory and the Limits of Academic Economics: Resolving the Political in Piketty’sCapital in the Twenty-First Century
Author(s) -
Daniel Krier,
Kevin S. Amidon
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
critical sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.867
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1569-1632
pISSN - 0896-9205
DOI - 10.1177/0896920514565487
Subject(s) - capitalism , discipline , politics , capital (architecture) , neoclassical economics , distancing , economics , work (physics) , positive economics , sociology , social science , political science , law , covid-19 , mechanical engineering , disease , archaeology , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , history , engineering , medicine
This essay assesses the central arguments of Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. We note Piketty’s limited engagement with and active distancing from the writings of Marx. Piketty’s location within the disciplinary boundaries of academic economics seems to have profoundly shaped his surprisingly apolitical analysis. Engagement with the political dimensions of capital is further constrained to increase the book’s influence upon policy. We analyze important limitations to Piketty’s work that result from these disciplinary constraints. Important politically implicated concepts, problems, and approaches that relate to Piketty’s substantial empirical work are: labor process studies, research on speculative capitalism, and literature highlighting institutional and political determinants among varieties of capitalism.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom