z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on the Healing of Exit Sites of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters in Rats
Author(s) -
Pecoits-Filho Roberto F.S.,
Twardowski Zbylut J.,
Khanna Ramesh,
Kim Yong-Lim,
Goel Sharad,
Moore Harold
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
peritoneal dialysis international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.79
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1718-4304
pISSN - 0896-8608
DOI - 10.1177/089686089801800107
Subject(s) - medicine , peritoneal dialysis , antibiotics , antibiotic prophylaxis , dialysis , intensive care medicine , surgery , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Objective To evaluate the influence of intraperitoneal (IP) antibiotic (AB) prophylaxis on the quality of healing and infection rates of exit sites in peritoneal dialysis catheters.Study Design Twenty-one Sprague-Dawley rats were dialyzed 3 times per day for 6 weeks. Dianeal solution containing AB was used for all the rats during the first 5 days. The animals were randomized on the sixth day into three groups: group A (AB-free after randomization), group B (AB for 3 weeks), and group C (AB during 6 weeks). Scores were given to each exit site according to the observation. Mean scores from each group were compared in an attempt to find significant differences between the groups. Dialysate and exit-site drainage samples were taken weekly for microbiology.Results Eight episodes of peritonitis were diagnosed, six in group A and two in group B. The most common bacteria causing peritonitis were gram-negative rods. The mean scores were not significantly different between groups C and B throughout the study, even after the discontinuation of the prophylaxis. Group A, when compared to the other two groups, had significantly higher scores after the second week and throughout the rest of the study.Conclusion Intraperitoneal antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 weeks after catheter implantation is an effective way to prevent early colonization of exit sites, providing a better healing quality and lower incidence of catheter-related infection. Although the extension of the prophylaxis for 6 weeks seems to be beneficial, it was not statistically proven in this study.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom