Peritoneal Dialysis Access. Prospective Randomized Trial of 3 Different Peritoneal Catheters Preliminary Report
Author(s) -
Scott P.D.,
Bakran A.,
Pearson R.,
Riad H.,
Parrott N.,
Johnson R.W.G.,
Gokal R.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
peritoneal dialysis international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.79
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1718-4304
pISSN - 0896-8608
DOI - 10.1177/089686089401400320
Subject(s) - peritoneal dialysis , medicine , randomized controlled trial , surgery , intensive care medicine
Editar: Ever since the introduction oflong-term peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal failure in the 1960s, peritoneal access problems have been a major source of morbidity in these patients. Catheter complication rates for surgically inserted straight Tenckhoff catheters average about 17% for failure to drain, 25% for exit-site infections, and 13% for subcutaneous leaks and hernias (1). No prospective randomized study has looked at different catheter outcomes. We undertook such a study having initially done a prospective audit on outcome of catheter placements, over a 6month period, when 41 consecutive straight doublecuff Tenckhoff insertions through paramedial insertions were assessed. Eleven patients (27%) required further surgery because of failure to drain, and 2 patients required three and four procedures, respectively. There were, in addition, two early leaks that settled after conservative therapy, two wound infections, and two late catheter migrations. Of the 41 insertions, 21 had complications (51 %), an unacceptably high rate. A randomized prospective study using standard double-cuffTenckhoff, Toronto Western double-disk, and standard coiled catheter was undertaken in 89 patients. Catheters were surgically inserted under standardized conditions and surgical techniques. The three groups were matched for demographic data. The results (Table 1) revealed no difference in outcome with similar complication rates over a mean follow-up of 12 months (5 19 months) in the three catheter groups. This study reveals that com plications secondary to catheter insertion can be considerably reduced if the standardized surgical technique is adopted. It also indicates that any study of this nature usually reduces complications if more scrupulous attention is given to detail. In addition, a dedicated team of surgical and medical catheter inserters is essential (2). Our study also reveals that constant audit of experiences is essential to identify problems, but corrective measures can be introduced.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom