Intraperitoneal Vancomycin/Oral Pefloxacin versus Intraperitoneal Vancomycin/Gentamicin in the Treatment of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Peritonitis
Author(s) -
Lye Wai-Choong,
Lee Evan J.C.,
Van Der Straaten Jane
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
peritoneal dialysis international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.79
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1718-4304
pISSN - 0896-8608
DOI - 10.1177/089686089301302s87
Subject(s) - medicine , peritonitis , peritoneal dialysis , continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis , vancomycin , surgery , gentamicin , anesthesia , gastroenterology , antibiotics , staphylococcus aureus , biology , bacteria , microbiology and biotechnology , genetics
Sixty patients were enrolled In a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of two different regl mens for the empirical treatment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) peritonitis. At presentation, Group I received Intraperitoneal vancomycin (1 g) and oral pefioxacin (400 mg b.l.d.), and Group II Intraperitoneal vancomycin (1 g) and gentamicin (80 mg loading dose, followed by 15 mg/2 L). Treatment duration was 14 days. Despite randomization, Group I had significantly more patients with primary Candida peritonitis. When fungal peritonitis was excluded from analysis, there were no significant differences In the treatment success rate (Group I, 73.3% vs Group II, 80.0%, p=NS), number of relapses (Group 1,0 vs Group II, 1), and Tenckhoff catheter removal rates (Group 1,26.6% vs Group 11,16.6%, p=NS) between the two groups. The patients treated with pefioxacin had an increased incidence of nausea and vomiting. In selected situations oral pefioxacin may be a suitable substitute for intraperitoneal gentamicin as outpatient therapy for CAPD peritonitis.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom