z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An Analysis of State Statutes Regarding the Role of Law Enforcement
Author(s) -
Cortright Carly E.,
McCann Wesley,
Willits Dale,
Hemmens Craig,
Stohr Mary K.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
criminal justice policy review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.993
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1552-3586
pISSN - 0887-4034
DOI - 10.1177/0887403418806562
Subject(s) - statute , officer , law , law enforcement , dominance (genetics) , peacekeeping , state (computer science) , political science , order (exchange) , enforcement , criminology , sociology , business , biochemistry , chemistry , finance , algorithm , computer science , gene
Police officer roles are typically divided into either crime control or peacekeeping/order maintenance functions. With the prevalence of community-oriented policing (COP), the majority of an officer’s duties are ostensibly more order maintenance in nature, but in the post-Ferguson world, the crime-fighting, warrior cop mentality still holds firm, which is in conflict with the tenets of COP. State statutes dictate the legal role of police officer and prior analyses demonstrated a shift over time toward including more order maintenance tasks following the emergence of COP. This analysis reexamines these statutes to determine if this shift continued. Our findings indicate a counterintuitive reversal in the trend, with more states removing order maintenance and peacekeeping duties from their statutes despite the wide dominance of COP.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom