When does war end? Armistice and the Prize Courts of the twentieth century
Author(s) -
Sarah Craze
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of maritime history
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.116
H-Index - 6
eISSN - 2052-7756
pISSN - 0843-8714
DOI - 10.1177/0843871418822437
Subject(s) - surrender , law , adversary , political science , law of war , spanish civil war , suez canal , curiosity , international law , economics , international trade , psychology , statistics , mathematics , social psychology
This article uses prize law to examine the end of war in the twentieth century. The Armistice agreement that concluded the First World War enshrined the victor’s right to seize enemy merchant ships after the cessation of military hostilities, shifting the legal understanding of a hostile act. This disconnection turned prize into a strategic tool for victors to use over belligerents. This appeared again in the Second World War, when prize courts condoned the taking of prize after Germany’s surrender. Egypt used prize law as a strategic tool to continue its prohibition against Israel’s use of the Suez Canal. The article concludes prize-taking in the twentieth century was not just a historical curiosity, but a strategic imperative for victors.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom