English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this commentary (which is by no means a review of chronotyping), I try to clarify the distinction between 2 different ways of assessing chronotype by questionnaires. The morningness/eveningness questionnaire (MEQ) determines daily preferences producing a score, and the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire aims to determine phase of entrainment producing a time. An understanding of the MEQ requires knowledge of its history. Although both have their respective validity, they mean very different things and should be used appropriately in studies with different aims and questions. Although they show correlations in population comparisons, they should not be amalgamated when reviewing the literature.

Having Trouble Typing? What on Earth Is Chronotype?