Wechsler Administration and Scoring Errors Made by Graduate Students and School Psychologists
Author(s) -
Oak Erika,
Viezel Kathleen D.,
Dumont Ron,
Willis John
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of psychoeducational assessment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.631
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1557-5144
pISSN - 0734-2829
DOI - 10.1177/0734282918786355
Subject(s) - psychology , wechsler adult intelligence scale , cognition , raw score , clinical psychology , wechsler intelligence scale for children , norm (philosophy) , applied psychology , medical education , raw data , psychiatry , medicine , statistics , mathematics , political science , law
Individuals trained in the use of cognitive tests should be able to complete an assessment without making administrative, scoring, or recording errors. However, an examination of 295 Wechsler protocols completed by graduate students and practicing school psychologists revealed that errors are the norm, not the exception. The most common errors included failure to administer sample items, incorrect calculation of raw scores, failure to record responses verbatim, and failure to query. Significant differences were found between specific error frequencies of students and practitioners. Adequate training in administering the Wechsler scales is clearly essential. Based on the outcome of this study, it is recommended that programs training students to administer cognitive assessments provide ample feedback, and that practicing psychologists maintain best practices and take part in continuing education regarding cognitive assessments.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom