Open AccessOccupational therapy and psychosis: POINTER feasibility study for a pragmatic clinical trial
Author(s) -
Joanne Inman,
Katrina Bannigan,
Jacqui Akhurst
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the british journal of occupational therapy/british journal of occupational therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.39
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1477-6006
pISSN - 0308-0226
DOI - 10.1177/03080226211000257
Subject(s) - occupational therapy , fidelity , medicine , intervention (counseling) , physical therapy , rehabilitation , focus group , clinical trial , occupational rehabilitation , clinical psychology , psychology , nursing , electrical engineering , marketing , engineering , business , pathology
The dearth of clinical trials of individualised occupational therapy with people with a diagnosis of psychosis limits the evidence base globally for occupational therapy practice. This study evaluated the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic clinical trial.Method Mixed methods design using a pragmatic perspective; two-centre, one-group pretest-posttest study, at six months. POINTER Occupational Intervention Specification captured routine individualised occupational therapy. Process evaluation included recruitment, retention, intervention delivery, fidelity, adherence and outcome measurement. The primary outcome was participation in activities of everyday life, measured by Time Use Survey, Participation Scale and Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure measured self-reported experience of and satisfaction with occupational performance. The Short Form-36v2 Health Survey measured health-related quality of life, a secondary outcome. Participants’ experiences were explored using a questionnaire. Intervention providers’ perspectives were investigated via the POINTER occupational intervention log and focus groups.Results Recruitment was (20/36) and drop-out 20% (4/20). Fidelity was 77%, and adherence was good; POINTER had validity and utility. Outcome measurement was acceptable to participants, indicating increased participation in activities of everyday life.Conclusion A larger clinical trial is merited; recruitment processes need further exploration, and outcome measurement needs refining.