z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
From Thebes to Piramesse — and Back: On the Text History of Supplementary Chapter 166 of the Book of the Dead
Author(s) -
Harco Willems
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the journal of egyptian archaeology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.113
H-Index - 9
eISSN - 2514-0582
pISSN - 0307-5133
DOI - 10.1177/0307513320974696
Subject(s) - colophon , interpretation (philosophy) , context (archaeology) , history , period (music) , textual criticism , literature , criticism , classics , art , philosophy , linguistics , archaeology , aesthetics
The colophon of BD supplementary chapter 166 states that the text had been found at the neck of Ramses II’s mummy. Dahms, Pehal, and Willems had argued in JEA 100 (2014) that the original document had not formed part of the original tomb equipment of Ramses II, but had been added in the course of the Twenty-First Dynasty after the tomb robberies in the Valley of the Kings. In 2016, J. Quack raised fundamental criticism against this interpretation, arguing that the text dates to the early Ramesside Period and had probably been applied in Piramesse to the mummy of Ramses II. The present article offers a critical reassessment of Quack’s paper. The linguistic register of funerary texts, the development of the negative aorist, and contextual indications strengthen the idea that the text was written in Thebes in the Twenty-First Dynasty in the social context of the Amun priesthood.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom