z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Higher and colder: The success and failure of boundaries in high altitude and Antarctic research stations
Author(s) -
Vanessa Heggie
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
social studies of science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.609
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1460-3659
pISSN - 0306-3127
DOI - 10.1177/0306312716636249
Subject(s) - construct (python library) , field (mathematics) , frame (networking) , work (physics) , set (abstract data type) , population , sociology , geography , earth science , data science , computer science , geology , engineering , demography , mathematics , pure mathematics , programming language , mechanical engineering , telecommunications
This article offers a series of case studies of field stations and field laboratories based at high altitudes in the Alps, Himalayas and Antarctica, which have been used by Western scientists (largely physiologists and physicists) from circa 1820 to present. It rejects the common frame for work on such spaces that polarizes a set of generalizations about practices undertaken in 'the field' versus 'the laboratory'. Field sites are revealed as places that can be used to highlight common and crucial features of modern experimental science that are exposed by, but not uniquely the properties of, fieldwork. This includes heterogeneity of population and practice, diverse afterlives, the manner in which spaces of science construct individual and group expertise, and the extensive support and funding structures needed for modern scientific work.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom