Stay or Exit: Why Do Nonprofits Maintain Collaborations With Government?
Author(s) -
Peng Shuyang,
Liao Yuguo,
Lu Jiahuan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the american review of public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.737
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1552-3357
pISSN - 0275-0740
DOI - 10.1177/0275074019867413
Subject(s) - continuance , public service motivation , government (linguistics) , public relations , business , procedural justice , sample (material) , public service , political science , psychology , social psychology , public sector , linguistics , philosophy , chemistry , chromatography , neuroscience , law , perception
Although the public-management literature has demonstrated a growing interest in public–nonprofit collaborations, it pays little attention to the sustainability of collaborations. This study proposes that nonprofits’ intentions to maintain collaborations with government are influenced by both instrumental and relational factors. Using a national sample of human service nonprofits, this study demonstrates that both nonprofits’ continuance commitment and affective commitment play a role in shaping their intentions to maintain collaborative relationships with government. Specifically, continuance commitment is driven by the presence of a formal agreement and the dependence on government funding, and affective commitment is shaped by distributive and procedural justice. The findings have implications for public managers to effectively manage their collaborations with nonprofits.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom