z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
What is the best method to determine excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer–related lymphoedema in clinical practice? Reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five different methods
Author(s) -
De Vrieze Tessa,
Gebruers Nick,
Tjalma Wiebren AA,
Nevelsteen Ines,
Thomis Sarah,
De Groef An,
Dams Lore,
Van der Gucht Elien,
Belgrado Jean-Paul,
Vandermeeren Liesbeth,
Devoogdt Nele
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
clinical rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.15
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1477-0873
pISSN - 0269-2155
DOI - 10.1177/0269215519835907
Subject(s) - intraclass correlation , reliability (semiconductor) , circumference , medicine , nuclear medicine , volume (thermodynamics) , clinical practice , breast cancer , tape measure , standard error , statistics , mathematics , physical therapy , cancer , reproducibility , physics , geometry , power (physics) , quantum mechanics
Objective: To investigate the reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five commonly used methods for assessing excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer–related lymphoedema (BCRL).Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.Subjects: 30 participants with unilateral BCRL.Methods: Excessive arm volume was determined by five different methods: traditional volumetry with overflow, volumetry without overflow, inverse volumetry, optoelectronic volumetry and calculated volume based on circumference measurements. To investigate intra- and inter-rater reliability, measurements were performed twice by the same assessor and once by a different assessor. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard errors of the measurement (SEMs) and systematic changes between the means were calculated. To determine time efficiency, the mean setup time, execution time and total time were examined for each method. Furthermore, 12 limitations regarding clinical feasibility were listed and scored for each method. Finally, an overall ranking score was determined between the methods.Results: Mean age was 65 (±8) years and mean body mass index was 28 (±4) kg/m 2 . Intra- and inter-rater reliability ranged between strong and very strong. Calculated arm volume based on circumferences (mean excessive arm volume: assessor A: 477 (±367) mL; assessor B: 470 (±367) mL; assessor A (second time): 493 (±362) mL) showed the highest intra- and inter-rater ICCs of .987 and .984, respectively. Optoelectronic volumetry was the fastest method, representing a mean total time of 1 minute and 43 (±26) seconds for performing a bilateral measurement. The least limitations were reported on the calculated volume based on the circumference method (3 out of 12 limitations).Conclusion: Calculated volume based on arm circumferences is the best measurement method for evaluating excessive arm volume over time in terms of reliability, low error rate, low cost, few limitations and the time spent.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom