z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Doubt and the Algorithm: On the Partial Accounts of Machine Learning
Author(s) -
Amoore Louise
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
theory, culture & society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.747
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1460-3616
pISSN - 0263-2764
DOI - 10.1177/0263276419851846
Subject(s) - epistemology , humanism , subject (documents) , artificial intelligence , sociology , algorithm , transhumanism , computer science , posthuman , feynman diagram , action (physics) , event (particle physics) , philosophy , mathematics , physics , quantum mechanics , library science , mathematical physics , theology
In a 1955 lecture the physicist Richard Feynman reflected on the place of doubt within scientific practice. ‘Permit us to question, to doubt, to not be sure’, proposed Feynman, ‘it is possible to live and not to know’. In our contemporary world, the science of machine learning algorithms appears to transform the relations between science, knowledge and doubt, to make even the most doubtful event amenable to action. What might it mean to ‘leave room for doubt’ or ‘to live and not to know’ in our contemporary culture, where the algorithm plays a major role in the calculability of doubts? I propose a posthuman mode of doubt that decentres the liberal humanist subject. In the science of machine learning algorithms the doubts of human and technological beings nonetheless dwell together, opening onto a future that is never fully reduced to the single output signal, to the optimised target.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom