z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Bearing Witness, Moral Responsibility and Distant Suffering
Author(s) -
David W. Hill
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
theory culture and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.747
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1460-3616
pISSN - 0263-2764
DOI - 10.1177/0263276418776366
Subject(s) - presentation (obstetrics) , witness , psychology , social psychology , moral responsibility , raising (metalworking) , sociology , aesthetics , epistemology , political science , law , philosophy , medicine , geometry , mathematics , radiology
Media analyses of the aesthetic presentation of news frequently and persuasively demonstrate the skewed ethics of news production, where those in need who are distant and dissimilar are often presented in ways that do not fully humanize their condition. However, it is argued here, they also locate too fully the locus of moral responsibility in the production and presentation of the media text. This article explores the moral demands inherent in two kinds of media presentation: the explicit focus on shock and awe over intimacy; and minimal presentations that substitute bare information (such as statistics or maps) for affective stories. It is argued that in both cases a moral encounter with the other can be motivated despite the news presentation and it is concluded that an excessive emphasis on the role of the news in generating moral responsibility justifies a spectatorish inertia that should be resisted.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom