Open AccessPrecarious Times, Professional Tensions: The Ethics of Migration Research and the Drive for Scientific Accountability
Author(s) -
Irene Bloemraad,
Cecilia Menjívar
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the international migration review/international migration review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.109
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1747-7379
pISSN - 0197-9183
DOI - 10.1177/01979183211014455
Subject(s) - accountability , transparency (behavior) , research ethics , public relations , confidentiality , political science , context (archaeology) , open science , sociology , government (linguistics) , harm , engineering ethics , law , paleontology , linguistics , philosophy , physics , astronomy , biology , engineering
How should migration scholars navigate tensions between our ethical responsibilities to research participants and growing "open science" calls for data transparency, replication, and accountability? We elaborate a three-step process to navigate these tensions. First, researchers must understand core principles behind open-science initiatives and the mandates of research ethics boards, especially those related to privacy, confidentiality, and protection from harm, and take them seriously. Second, migration researchers must think beyond routinized or mandated procedures to carefully consider the unique vulnerabilities of migrants in their study, which depend on socio-political context. Third, if vulnerabilities are significant, migration researchers should modify (or challenge) procedures elaborated in the name of open science or routinized research ethic board mandates, if inappropriate for their study. We, thus, encourage migration scholars to engage with open-science advocates but also to educate colleagues on migrants' vulnerabilities and to double-down on data security, including vis-à-vis government authorities, as evolving technologies continue to change research practices.