Open AccessInfluence of Age at Cochlear Implantation and Frequency‐to‐Place Mismatch on Early Speech Recognition in Adults
Author(s) -
Canfarotta Michael W.,
O’Connell Brendan P.,
Buss Emily,
Pillsbury Harold C.,
Brown Kevin D.,
Dillon Margaret T.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
otolaryngology–head and neck surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.232
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1097-6817
pISSN - 0194-5998
DOI - 10.1177/0194599820911707
Subject(s) - audiology , cochlear implant , spiral ganglion , medicine , formant , cochlear implantation , otosclerosis , population , hearing loss , speech recognition , environmental health , vowel , computer science
Objective Default frequency filters of cochlear implant (CI) devices assign frequency information irrespective of intracochlear position, resulting in varying degrees of frequency‐to‐place mismatch. Substantial mismatch negatively influences speech recognition in postlingually deafened CI recipients, and acclimatization may be particularly challenging for older adults due to effects of aging on the auditory pathway. The present report investigated the influence of mismatch and age at implantation on speech recognition within the initial 6 months of CI use. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods Forty‐eight postlingually deafened adult CI recipients of lateral wall electrode arrays underwent postoperative computed tomography to determine angular insertion depth of each electrode contact. Frequency‐to‐place mismatch was determined by comparing spiral ganglion place frequencies to default frequency filters. Consonant‐nucleus‐consonant (CNC) scores in the CI‐alone condition at 1, 3, and 6 months postactivation were compared to the degree of mismatch at 1500 Hz and age at implantation. Results Younger adult CI recipients experienced more rapid growth in speech recognition during the initial 6 months postactivation. Greater degrees of frequency‐to‐place mismatch were associated with poorer performance, yet older listeners were not particularly susceptible to this effect. Conclusions While older adults are not necessarily more sensitive to detrimental effects of frequency‐to‐place mismatch, other factors appear to limit early benefit with a CI in this population. These results suggest that minimizing mismatch could optimize outcomes in adult CI recipients across the life span, which may be particularly beneficial in the elderly considering auditory processing deficits associated with advanced age.