Open AccessPreoperative Tracheostomy Is Associated with Poor Disease‐Free Survival in Recurrent Laryngeal Cancer
Author(s) -
Birkeland Andrew C.,
Rosko Andrew J.,
Beesley Lauren,
Bellile Emily,
Chinn Steven B.,
Shuman Andrew G.,
Prince Mark E.,
Wolf Gregory T.,
Bradford Carol R.,
Brenner J. Chad,
Spector Matthew E.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
otolaryngology–head and neck surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.232
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1097-6817
pISSN - 0194-5998
DOI - 10.1177/0194599817709236
Subject(s) - medicine , laryngectomy , hazard ratio , surgery , retrospective cohort study , stage (stratigraphy) , confidence interval , cancer , radiation therapy , single center , larynx , paleontology , biology
Objectives It is unknown if preoperative tracheostomy for persistent/recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) plays a role in unrecognized local disease spread and disease recurrence after salvage laryngectomy. The goals of this study were to determine the effect of preoperative tracheostomy on disease‐free survival (DFS) in patients with recurrent/persistent LSCC undergoing salvage laryngectomy. Study Design Retrospective case series derived from prospectively maintained database. Setting Tertiary care academic center. Subjects Patients with recurrent/persistent LSCC after radiation/chemoradiation (RT/CRT) who underwent salvage laryngectomy at the University of Michigan from 1997 to 2015. Methods Demographic, clinical, pathologic, and survival data were collected. Kaplan‐Meier survival estimates were performed. Results DFS was worse for patients with tracheostomy prior to laryngectomy than patients without a tracheostomy (5 year: 39% vs 67%; P <. 001). Patients with tracheostomy prior to RT/CRT compared to patients with tracheostomy after RT/CRT or patients without a tracheostomy had worse DFS (5‐year: 25%, 49%, and 67%, respectively; P <. 001). In bivariable analyses controlling for T classification, N classification, or overall stage, preoperative tracheostomy was associated with worse DFS. In multivariable analysis, presence of a preoperative tracheostomy had a worse DFS (hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.00‐2.67; P =. 048). Conclusion Preoperative tracheostomy is associated with disease recurrence in patients with persistent/recurrent LSCC undergoing salvage laryngectomy, particularly in patients who had tracheostomy prior to completion of initial RT/CRT. Notably, preoperative tracheostomy as a causal factor vs marker for disease recurrence is difficult to ascertain. Nevertheless, clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with preoperative tracheostomy when counseling on surgical salvage and when considering the role of additional therapy.