Acute Dacryocystitis with Empyema of the Lacrimal Sac: Is Immediate Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Justified?
Author(s) -
Lombardi Davide,
Mattavelli Davide,
Accorona Remo,
Turano Raffaele,
Semeraro Francesco,
Bozzola Anna,
Nicolai Piero
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
otolaryngology–head and neck surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.232
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1097-6817
pISSN - 0194-5998
DOI - 10.1177/0194599814527236
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , dacryocystorhinostomy , dacryocystitis , lacrimal sac , perioperative , empyema , complication , referral , family medicine
Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (Endo‐DCR) in the treatment of acute dacryocystitis with lacrimal sac empyema (ADLSE). Design Case series with chart review. Setting Academic tertiary center. Patients The study included 26 consecutive patients who underwent Endo‐DCR for ADLSE between August 2005 and December 2013. Main Outcome Measures The success of the procedure was defined as complete complaint relief and DCR patency. Data on the time from referral to surgery, postoperative complications, and revision surgery are also reported. Results The present patient series included 4 males (15.4%) and 22 females (84.6%) (mean age, 66 years). The mean time between referral and surgery was 0.88 days and the mean follow‐up time was 29 months. All patients showed immediate relief from symptoms, with no ADLSE recurrences. Complete success was achieved in 25 (96.2%) cases; the only failure was in a patient who had previously undergone radioiodine treatment. In this case, revision Endo‐DCR was not successful. The only perioperative complication (3.8%) was epistaxis in a patient who required revision surgery under general anesthesia. The definitive success rate was 96.2% after primary and revision surgery. Conclusions Endo‐DCR enables rapid resolution of ADLSE with a very high success rate. Immediate surgery may reduce the risk of skin fistulization and/or orbital complications. DCR shrinkage and lacrimal obstruction are unlikely with Endo‐DCR since the procedure is performed on an enlarged sac. The main advantage of Endo‐DCR, compared with external DCR, is the absence of a skin incision in an inflamed and infected field.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom