
Head and Neck Cancer Stem Cells: The Effect of HPV—An In Vitro and Mouse Study
Author(s) -
Tang Alice L.,
Owen John H.,
Hauff Samantha J.,
Park Jung Je,
Papagerakis Silvana,
Bradford Carol R.,
Carey Thomas E.,
Prince Mark E.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
otolaryngology–head and neck surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.232
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1097-6817
pISSN - 0194-5998
DOI - 10.1177/0194599813486599
Subject(s) - cancer research , cancer stem cell , head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , cisplatin , stem cell , cancer , biology , cell culture , cell , cell sorting , head and neck cancer , virology , immunology , medicine , flow cytometry , chemotherapy , microbiology and biotechnology , genetics
Objectives To determine if the behavior of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is affected by human papillomavirus (HPV) status. Study Design An in vitro and in vivo analysis of HPV and CSCs. Setting University laboratory. Subjects and Methods We isolated CSCs from HPV‐positive and HPV‐negative cell lines. Two HPV‐negative cell lines underwent lentiviral transduction of E6/E7. Chemoresistence was determined using colony formation assays. Native HPV‐positive and HPV E6/E7‐transduced cells were compared for lung colonization after tail vein injection in NOD/SCID mice. Results The proportion of CSC is not significantly different in HPV‐positive or HPV‐negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines. The HNSCC CSCs are more resistant to cisplatin than the non‐CSCs, but there were no significant differences between HPV‐positive and HPV‐negative cells. The HPV‐negative cancer cells yielded low colony formation after cell sorting. After transduction with HPV E6/E7, increased colony formation was observed in both CSCs and non‐CSCs. Results from tail vein injections yielded no differences in development of lung colonies between HPV E6/E7‐transduced cells and nontransduced cells. Conclusions Human papillomavirus status does not correlate with the proportion of CSCs present in HNSCC. The HPV‐positive cells and those transduced with HPV E6/E7 have a greater clonogenicity than HPV‐negative cells. The HNSCC CSCs are more resistant to cisplatin than non‐CSCs. This suggests that common chemotherapeutic agents may shrink tumor bulk by eliminating non‐CSCs, whereas CSCs have mechanisms that facilitate evasion of cell death. Human papillomavirus status does not affect CSC response to cisplatin therapy, suggesting that other factors explain the better outcomes for patients with HPV‐positive cancer.