z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reinnervation for Vocal Fold Paralysis: Results in Children
Author(s) -
Setlur Jennifer,
Bunting Glenn W.,
Ballif Catherine,
Hartnick Christopher J.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
otolaryngology–head and neck surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.232
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1097-6817
pISSN - 0194-5998
DOI - 10.1177/0194599812451426a351
Subject(s) - vocal fold paralysis , medicine , reinnervation , recurrent laryngeal nerve , otorhinolaryngology , paralysis , breathy voice , phonation , vocal cord paralysis , audiology , vocal folds , larynx , laryngoscopy , laryngology , surgery , anesthesia , thyroid , intubation
Objective 1) Exhibit long‐term follow‐up results of patients with unilateral vocal fold immobility who underwent ANSA reinnervation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. 2) Demonstrate the appropriate studies that should be performed at the time of follow‐up. Method Retrospective review in a tertiary care otolaryngology practice. Four patients with symptomatic unilateral vocal fold paralysis who underwent recurrent laryngeal nerve reinnervation by a single surgeon were reviewed between September 2005 and December 2011. Postoperative measurements were obtained, both subjective (voice questionnaire) and objective (acoustic measurements and aerodynamics). Results The study group included 3 girls and 1 boy ages 2 to 12 years. Mean follow‐up time was 4.25 years. Causes for vocal fold paralysis were cardiac surgery (3) and skull base neoplasm (1). Voice questionnaire results (0 = severely abnormal, 100 = normal) were 100 in 2 patients, 98 in 1 patient, and 96 in 1 patient indicating a high level of satisfaction postoperatively in all patients. Mean maximum phonation time was 7.7 seconds, mean s/z ratio was 2.15, and mean subglottal pressure was 8.8 cm H 2 O. Conclusion Children who undergo ANSA reinnervation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve have normal or near normal subjective voice scores. Objective scores may not reflect the same change. In this population, it may be beneficial for the practitioner to rely upon subjective measures rather than objective measures to determine treatment success.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here