
A Survey of Steroid Use in Otolaryngology
Author(s) -
Govil Nandini,
Paul Benjamin,
Amin Milan R.,
Branski Ryan C.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
otolaryngology–head and neck surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.232
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1097-6817
pISSN - 0194-5998
DOI - 10.1177/0194599812451426a20
Subject(s) - otorhinolaryngology , medicine , glucocorticoid , demographics , medical prescription , family medicine , throat , drug , surgery , pharmacology , demography , sociology
Objective Glucocorticoids are commonly used treatments in otolaryngology, but guidelines about their use are vague and irregular. We sought to assess clinical practices with regard to glucocorticoid use for patients with laryngeal disease and to ascertain factors driving clinician drug choice. Method A web‐based survey was distributed to otolaryngologists via email using the Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Journal database. This survey was composed of 20 questions and collected the following data from respondents: 1) indications for the use of glucocorticoids in their practice, 2) decision‐making process influencing the choice of glucocorticoid, 3) background and demographics. Results Two hundred eight otolaryngologists completed the survey, with 99% (n = 196) reporting that glucocorticoids were valuable to their practice. “Previous experience/results,” “familiarity,” and “use in practice” (n = 144, 114, and 79, respectively) were commonly cited reasons for choosing a particular glucocorticoid, whereas pharmacokinetic profile and “academic literature” were infrequently cited concerns. Only 54.4% (n = 106) of respondents said that they were more likely to prescribe glucocorticoids for vocal performers as compared to other patients. Additionally, most respondents said side effects only “occasionally” prevented them from prescribing glucocorticoids to patients. Conclusion These results suggest that glucocorticoid prescription practices vary greatly between otolaryngologists, and drug choice is driven primarily by clinician preference rather than more objective factors. These findings indicate a need for further research about this powerful class of drugs, and the importance of establishing clear, appropriate guidelines regarding their use.