Open AccessImpact of Nasal Drug Delivery System on Mucociliary Clearance
Author(s) -
Schuschnig Uwe,
KhademSaba Gülnaz,
Häussinger Karl,
Canis Martin,
Becker Sven,
Keller Manfred,
Möller Winfried
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
otolaryngology–head and neck surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.232
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1097-6817
pISSN - 0194-5998
DOI - 10.1177/0194599811416318a264
Subject(s) - mucociliary clearance , nebulizer , clearance , nose , nasal spray , medicine , deposition (geology) , drug delivery , clearance rate , aerosol , nasal administration , anesthesia , chemistry , pharmacology , surgery , lung , urology , paleontology , organic chemistry , sediment , biology
Objective Aerosolized drugs are predominantly delivered by nasal sprays, but they target the anterior nose only, and the administered drug is rapidly cleared. Studies with pulsating aerosols showed improved sinonasal deposition. This study compared clearance kinetics and cumulative dose after nasal spray and pulsating aerosol delivery. Method Open label deposition study in 15 healthy volunteers using radiolabeled pulsating aerosols generated by a Vibrent nebulizer in comparison to nasal pump sprays. Nasal deposition and retention was assessed by gamma camera imaging at various time intervals over 24‐hours in the entire nose and in specified ROIs. Results Nasal pump spray vs pulsating aerosol application resulted in a nasal deposition of 100% vs 70 ± 16%. Conclusion As found in earlier studies, nasal clearance of pulsating aerosols is significantly retarded compared with nasal sprays, causing prolonged drug residence time in the nose. Our data suggest that this effect may be related to the small droplet size and pulsations rather than deposition in certain nasal regions.