z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Novel Lid Crease Approach to Supraorbital Mucoceles
Author(s) -
Desai Lajja,
Chang Eugene H.,
Allen Richard C.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
otolaryngology–head and neck surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.232
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1097-6817
pISSN - 0194-5998
DOI - 10.1177/0194599811415823a379
Subject(s) - mucocele , medicine , frontal sinus , scars , surgery , frontal bone , blepharoplasty , eyelid , skull
Objective 1) Review various approaches to lateral frontal supraorbital mucoceles (endoscopic, open: bicoronal, hemicoronal with osteoplastic flap, subfrontal, and supraciliary approach). 2) Describe a hybrid lid crease approach that allows the direct excision of the mucocele lining and harvest of a pericranial flap through a minimally invasive well‐hidden blepharoplasty incision. Method 1) Literature review of current endoscopic and open approaches for the removal of frontal/supraorbital mucoceles. 2) Description of surgical technique of the lid crease approach, harvest of pericranial flap, and a representative case with radiology, pathology, preoperative photos, intraoperative photos, postoperative photos, and follow‐up. Results Open approaches to the frontal sinus are successful in the removal of lateral frontal/supraorbital mucoceles. However, disadvantages include large scars and increased operative and recovery time. Endoscopic approaches are also successful but can be limited in lateral frontal lesions. We describe a novel approach via a lid crease incision. This approach provides direct access to the frontal sinus with complete removal of the mucocele lining. In addition, a pericranial flap can be harvested to obliterate the frontal sinus. In our case, one month postoperative photos show a well‐hidden scar and 9‐month follow‐up does not show recurrence of disease. Conclusion The hybrid lid crease approach combines the advantages of direct removal of the mucocele lining in a well‐hidden blepharoplasty incision. Although long‐term follow‐up is required to validate this technique, our preliminary data suggests this technique combines the advantages of both open and endoscopic approaches.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here