Sex Differences in Regret: All For Love or Some For Lust?
Author(s) -
Neal J. Roese,
Ginger L. Pennington,
Jill M. Coleman,
Maria Janicki,
Norman P. Li,
Douglas T. Kenrick
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
personality and social psychology bulletin
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.584
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1552-7433
pISSN - 0146-1672
DOI - 10.1177/0146167206286709
Subject(s) - regret , psychology , social psychology , romance , counterfactual thinking , perspective (graphical) , action (physics) , developmental psychology , interpersonal communication , interpersonal relationship , physics , quantum mechanics , machine learning , artificial intelligence , computer science , psychoanalysis
Few sex differences in regret or counterfactual thinking are evident in past research. The authors discovered a sex difference in regret that is both domain-specific (i.e., unique to romantic relationships) and interpretable within a convergence of theories of evolution and regulatory focus. Three studies showed that within romantic relationships, men emphasize regrets of inaction over action (which correspond to promotion vs. prevention goals, respectively), whereas women report regrets of inaction and action with equivalent frequency. Sex differences were not evident in other interpersonal regrets (friendship, parental, sibling interactions) and were not moderated by relationship status. Although the sex difference was evident in regrets centering on both sexual and nonsexual relationship aspects, it was substantially larger for sexual regrets. These findings underscore the utility of applying an evolutionary perspective to better understand goal-regulating, cognitive processes.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom