z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of three probability distributions and techno-economic analysis of wind energy production along the coastal belt of Pakistan
Author(s) -
Muhammad Sumair,
Tauseef Aized,
Syed Asad Raza Gardezi,
Muhammad Mahmood Aslam Bhutta,
Syed Muhammad Sohail Rehman,
Syed Ubaid ur Rehman
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
energy exploration and exploitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.435
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 2048-4054
pISSN - 0144-5987
DOI - 10.1177/0144598720931587
Subject(s) - weibull distribution , log normal distribution , wind speed , wind power , statistics , environmental science , rayleigh distribution , meteorology , probability distribution , renewable energy , mathematics , mean squared error , probability density function , geography , engineering , electrical engineering
Continuous probability distributions have long been used to model the wind data. No single distribution can be declared accurate for all locations. Therefore, a comparison of different distributions before actual wind resource assessment should be carried out. Current work focuses on the application of three probability distributions, i.e. Weibull, Rayleigh, and lognormal for wind resource estimation at six sites along the coastal belt of Pakistan. Four years’ (2015–2018) wind data measured each 60-minutes at 50 m height for six locations were collected from Pakistan Meteorological Department. Comparison of these distributions was done based on coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), root mean square error, and mean absolute percentage deviation. Comparison showed that Weibull distribution is the most accurate followed by lognormal and Rayleigh, respectively. Wind power density ( P D ) was evaluated and it was found that Karachi has the highest wind speed and P D as 5.82 m/s and 162.69 W/m 2 , respectively, while Jiwani has the lowest wind speed and P D as 4.62 m/s and 76.76 W/m 2 , respectively. Furthermore, feasibility of annual energy production (AEP) was determined using six turbines. It was found that Vestas V42 shows the worst performance while Bonus 1300/62 is the best with respect to annual energy production and Bonus 600/44 is the most economical. Finally, sensitivity analysis was carried out.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom