Do doctors read forms? A one-year audit of medical certificates submitted to a crematorium
Author(s) -
J. Stuart Horner,
J. Horner
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of the royal society of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.38
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1758-1095
pISSN - 0141-0768
DOI - 10.1177/014107689809100708
Subject(s) - audit , medical audit , computer science , world wide web , medicine , data science , accounting , business
To determine the thoroughness and accuracy with which medical certificates for cremation are completed, a record was made, during normal processing of the documents, of the number of questions that were not answered or answered wrongly, or in which clarification was required. Of 835 sets of forms only 346 (41 %) were completed sufficiently accurately for the cremation to proceed without further enquiry. Junior doctors contributed the most errors but general practitioners and consultants also contributed large numbers of errors. Doctors ought to be far more accurate and thorough in completing cremation certificates than were those audited here. The results cast doubt on the reliability of information supplied on other forms. In view of the high frequency of poorly completed forms, review by a medical referee remains essential.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom