English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The proportion of patients with an acute myocardial infarction (MI) whose diagnosis was missed on admission was accessed. The admitting consultants were then tested to see if they could diagnose the patients correctly when they were shown the admission histories and electrocardiograms (ECGs). Twenty-six per cent of patients with a final diagnosis of MI were not correctly diagnosed on admission. Fifty-one per cent of all patients did not receive thrombolytic therapy (TT) mainly because the diagnosis was not made on admission. A smaller proportion of these patients were admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU). The consultants only correctly diagnosed an average of 7.3 of the 20 patients who were mis-diagnosed on admission and would have prescribed TT to an average of 4.3 of these 20 patients. A significant proportion of patients had a diagnosis of MI missed on admission and therefore did not receive TT. Therefore, another aid to diagnosis such as serum creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) measurement should be available as an emergency test.

Audit on Myocardial Infarction in a District General Hospital: Is There Room for Improvement in Diagnostic Accuracy?