English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Forty specialists were asked about their management of three theoretical patients with advanced cancer of the head and neck. Reasons for variation were explored by considering the influence of perceived aims of treatment (radical or palliative), together with a number of factors relating to the tumour, the lymph nodes, and the patients' personal circumstances. The perceived aim of treatment was the most important determinant as to treatment modality but, when chances of influencing survival were small, there was disagreement as to the appropriate aim and subjective value judgements became influential. More careful analysis of the initial decision-making process is needed if new clinical trials are to significantly affect clinical practices.

Decision Making in Advanced Cancer of the Head and Neck: Variation in the Views of Medical Specialists