Can Survey Item Characteristics Relevant to Measurement Error Be Coded Reliably? A Case Study on 11 Dutch General Population Surveys
Author(s) -
Frank Bais,
Barry Schouten,
Peter Lugtig,
Vera Toepoel,
Judit ArendsTóth,
Salima Douhou,
N. D. Kieruj,
Mattijn Morren,
Corrie Vis
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
sociological methods and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1552-8294
pISSN - 0049-1241
DOI - 10.1177/0049124117729692
Subject(s) - observational error , reliability (semiconductor) , coding (social sciences) , statistics , computer science , item response theory , psychometrics , psychology , econometrics , mathematics , quantum mechanics , power (physics) , physics
Item characteristics can have a significant effect on survey data quality and may be associated with measurement error. Literature on data quality and measurement error is often inconclusive. This could be because item characteristics used for detecting measurement error are not coded unambiguously. In our study, we use a systematic coding procedure with multiple coders to investigate the extent to which the coding of item characteristics could be done reliably. For this purpose, we constructed an item characteristics scheme that is based on typologies of characteristics. High intercoder reliability indicates a clear relation between item characteristic, item content, and measurement error. Our results show that intercoder reliability is often low, especially for item characteristics that are hard to code due to subjectivity. Low intercoder reliability complicates comparisons between studies about item characteristics and measurement error. We give suggestions for coping with low intercoder reliability.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom