The Purity of Dirt: Revisiting Mary Douglas in the Light of Contemporary Consumer Interpretations of Naturalness, Purity and Dirt
Author(s) -
Kia Ditlevsen,
Sidse Schoubye Andersen
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.847
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1469-8684
pISSN - 0038-0385
DOI - 10.1177/0038038520934980
Subject(s) - naturalness , dirt , consumption (sociology) , interpretation (philosophy) , conceptualization , situated , sociology , aesthetics , natural (archaeology) , history , social science , art , ecology , archaeology , philosophy , biology , linguistics , physics , computer science , artificial intelligence , quantum mechanics
Food consumption and risks associated with it have changed substantially since the 1960s, yet the interpretation and conceptualization of ‘purity and danger’ have not evolved very much since Mary Douglas’ seminal work on the topic. In this study, we present an empirically based contemporary interpretation of purity and danger in relation to the consumption of food, dietary supplements and health-related everyday routines. Drawing on qualitative interviews from two recent Danish research projects, both situated within the field of consumption, we find that consumption choices are motivated by a (diffuse) sense of danger and anxiety about bodily contamination, resulting in a striving for purity. But in contrast with what was observed by Douglas in the 1960s, today’s purification strategies do not stress hygiene and sterility. Instead they focus on naturalness, even though ‘natural’ products are known to incorporate objectively dirty and non-sterile elements.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom