z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of virtual reality, 3D visualization and 2D visual interactive simulation: an exploratory meta-analysis
Author(s) -
Ikpe Justice Akpan,
Murali Shanker
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
simulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.301
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1741-3133
pISSN - 0037-5497
DOI - 10.1177/0037549718757039
Subject(s) - visualization , virtual reality , computer science , human–computer interaction , popularity , task (project management) , perception , key (lock) , artificial intelligence , psychology , engineering , social psychology , computer security , systems engineering , neuroscience
Research on the application of 3D visualization and virtual reality (VR) in discrete-event simulation (DES) has received increased attention in the past two decades. The increasing popularity of the 3D display in DES is mainly due to superior display capabilities and the associated benefits that it offers. However, the 2D display also continues to enjoy active use to date, thus provoking some fierce debates questioning the need for the 3D and VR if the 2D interface suffices. Several studies comparing the effectiveness of the different visualization methods also produce different conclusions. This paper undertakes a meta-analysis of the different positions and synthesizes the findings from 162 studies on the impacts of the 2D display versus 3D/VR on user performance on various DES tasks. The results highlight four key findings. First, the perception that the 2D display is more effective for model development is misleading as 3D/VR offers overall better performance and quality of models. Second, 3D/VR enabl...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom