z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Editor’s Note: The ambiguity of extra
Author(s) -
Rafael Heller
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
phi delta kappan
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.534
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1940-6487
pISSN - 0031-7217
DOI - 10.1177/00317217211013928
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , teamwork , mathematics education , creativity , curriculum , psychology , ambiguity , pedagogy , social psychology , computer science , political science , law , biochemistry , chemistry , programming language
Most people understand that extracurricular activities operate under different rules than students’ regular classes. What’s less clear is why certain activities are considered extracurricular. One argument is that the regular curriculum is for the more important content, while extracurricular programs are less important. But Rafael Heller suggests that the question of importance is not so clear. If extracurricular activities help students with social-emotional skills, creativity, teamwork, and other essential educational goals, perhaps they are not so extra after all.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom