Comorbidities in Trauma Injury Severity Scoring System: Refining Current Trauma Scoring System
Author(s) -
Adel Elkbuli,
Reed Yaras,
Ahmad Elghoroury,
Dessy Boneva,
Shaikh Hai,
Mark McKenney
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the american surgeon
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.331
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1555-9823
pISSN - 0003-1348
DOI - 10.1177/000313481908500130
Subject(s) - medicine , injury severity score , trauma center , comorbidity , mortality rate , injury prevention , poison control , retrospective cohort study , emergency medicine
The revised trauma score combined with the Injury Severity Score (ISS) remains the mostly commonly used system for predicting trauma mortality, but these scoring systems do not account for the patient's comorbidities. This study aims to evaluate the effect of comorbidities on ISS-related mortality and length of stay. A review of our trauma center's data registry from 2014 to 2016 was carried out. Patients were divided according to ISS into two groups: ISS ≤ 15 and ISS > 15. Each ISS group was then subdivided by number of comorbidities into two groups: 1 to 2 or ≥3 comorbidities. Demographic characteristics and outcome measures were compared. ANOVA, chi-squared, and t tests were used with significance defined as P 15 group with 1 to 2 comorbidities, the mortality rate was significantly higher (23.40% vs 4.50%, P 15 groups (31 vs 29 days) (P > 0.05). It was concluded that when controlling for injury severity, increased comorbidities are associated with a significantly higher mortality, indicating that they may serve as a marker of lower physiologic reserve and be an independent variable. Adding comorbidity parameters to the current trauma scoring systems can assist in predicting more accurate/reliable outcomes.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom