
Two Birds, One Stone: Unintended Consequences and a Potential Solution for Problems With Recovery in Mental Health
Author(s) -
Marcia G. Hunt,
Sandra G. Resnick
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
psychiatric services
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.517
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1557-9700
pISSN - 1075-2730
DOI - 10.1176/appi.ps.201400518
Subject(s) - mainstreaming , movement (music) , unintended consequences , health care , mental health , health professionals , psychology , nursing , economic justice , social movement , public relations , sociology , political science , medicine , psychotherapist , politics , law , pedagogy , aesthetics , special education , philosophy
Recovery began as a social justice movement. In more recent years, professionals have joined the movement, unintentionally co-opting and mainstreaming the more radical goals of these earlier activist consumer movements. The goals of the patient-centered care movement in general medical care are similar to those of "professional recovery." If mental health professionals instead adopted the language and goals of patient-centered care as a first step toward joining the two movements, the recovery movement could reclaim its social justice roots, and progress would be made toward reducing the duality between physical and mental health care systems. Professionals should return the recovery movement to those with lived experience, adopt the unified language of patient-centered care, and align professional transformation efforts under one holistic movement.