z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comments on “Current GCMs' Unrealistic Negative Feedback in the Arctic”
Author(s) -
Felix Pithan,
Thorsten Mauritsen
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of climate
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.315
H-Index - 287
eISSN - 1520-0442
pISSN - 0894-8755
DOI - 10.1175/jcli-d-12-00331.1
Subject(s) - longwave , coupled model intercomparison project , shortwave , climatology , environmental science , arctic , inversion (geology) , the arctic , positive feedback , atmospheric sciences , meteorology , general circulation model , radiative transfer , climate change , geology , geography , oceanography , physics , paleontology , engineering , quantum mechanics , structural basin , electrical engineering
In contrast to prior studies showing a positive lapse-rate feedback associated with the Arctic inversion, Boe et al. reported that strong present-day Arctic temperature inversions are associated with stronger negative longwave feedbacks and thus reduced Arctic amplification in the model ensemble from phase 3 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3). A permutation test reveals that the relation between longwave feedbacks and inversion strength is an artifact of statistical self-correlation and that shortwave feedbacks have a stronger correlation with intermodel spread. The present comment concludes that the conventional understanding of a positive lapse-rate feedback associated with the Arctic inversion is consistent with the CMIP3 model ensemble.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom