English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The impacts of four stratiform cloud parameterizations on seasonal mean fields are investigated using the global version of the Experimental Climate Prediction Center (ECPC) global to regional forecast system (G-RSM). The simulated fields are compared,with observation and reanalysis, including the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) data for clouds, the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) data for precipitation, the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) and the Surface Radiation Budget Project (SRB) data for radiation and the NCEP / Department of Energy (DOE) Reanalysis-2 (R- 2) for temperature. Compared to observation, no stratiform cloud parameterizationperformed better than others in all respects in simulating clouds, temperature, precipitation and radiation fluxes. This result may be caused by the fact that no fine tuning was performed to improve simulation for each stratiform cloud parameterization, together with the fact that the simulation is very sensitive

Comparison of Four Cloud Schemes in Simulating the Seasonal Mean Field Forced by the Observed Sea Surface Temperature