z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Towards Standardization of Quantitative Retinal Vascular Parameters: Comparison of SIVA and VAMPIRE Measurements in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936
Author(s) -
Sarah McGrory,
Adele M. Taylor,
Enrico Pellegrini,
Lucia Ballerini,
Mirna Kirin,
Fergus Doubal,
Joanna M. Wardlaw,
Alex S. F. Doney,
Baljean Dhillon,
John M. Starr,
Emanuele Trucco,
Ian J. Deary,
Tom MacGillivray
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
translational vision science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.508
H-Index - 21
ISSN - 2164-2591
DOI - 10.1167/tvst.7.2.12
Subject(s) - intraclass correlation , retinal , medicine , fundus (uterus) , vampire , retina , ophthalmology , statistics , optometry , mathematics , artificial intelligence , computer science , optics , physics , reproducibility
Purpose Semiautomated software applications derive quantitative retinal vascular parameters from fundus camera images. However, the extent of agreement between measurements from different applications is unclear. We evaluate the agreement between retinal measures from two software applications, the Singapore “I” Vessel Assessment (SIVA) and the Vessel Assessment and Measurement Platform for Images of the Retina (VAMPIRE), and examine respective associations between retinal and systemic outcomes. Method Fundus camera images from 665 Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 participants were analyzed with SIVA and VAMPIRE. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between retinal parameters: measurements of vessel width, fractal dimension, and tortuosity. Retinal–systemic variable associations were assessed with Pearson's correlation, and intersoftware correlation magnitude differences were examined with Williams's test. Results ICC values indicated poor to limited agreement for all retinal parameters (0.159–0.410). Bland-Altman plots revealed proportional bias in the majority, and systematic bias in all measurements. SIVA and VAMPIRE measurements were associated most consistently with systemic variables relating to blood pressure (SIVA r 's from −0.122 to −0.183; VAMPIRE r 's from −0.078 to −0.177). Williams's tests indicated significant differences in the magnitude of association between retinal and systemic variables for 7 of 77 comparisons ( P < 0.05). Conclusions Agreement between two common software applications was poor. Further studies are required to determine whether associations with systemic variables are software-dependent. Translational Relevance Standardization of the measurement of retinal vascular parameters is warranted to ensure that they are reliable and application-independent. This would be an important step towards realizing the potential of the retina as a source of imaging-derived biomarkers that are clinically useful.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom