Comparison of the New Perimetric GATE Strategy with Conventional Full-Threshold and SITA Standard Strategies | Zendy

Ulrich Schiefer | Zendy; J.P. Pascual | Zendy; Beth Edmunds | Zendy; Elisabeth Feudner | Zendy; Esther M. Hoff﻿mann | Zendy; Chris A. Johnson | Zendy; Wolf A. Lagrèze | Zendy; Norbert Pfeiffer | Zendy; Pamela A. Sample | Zendy; Flemming Staubach | Zendy; Richard G. Weleber | Zendy; Reinhard Vonthein | Zendy; E. Krapp | Zendy; Jens Paetzold | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison of the New Perimetric GATE Strategy with Conventional Full-Threshold and SITA Standard Strategies

Author(s) -

Ulrich Schiefer,

J.P. Pascual,

Beth Edmunds,

Elisabeth Feudner,

Esther M. Hoffmann,

Chris A. Johnson,

Wolf A. Lagrèze,

Norbert Pfeiffer,

Pamela A. Sample,

Flemming Staubach,

Richard G. Weleber,

Reinhard Vonthein,

E. Krapp,

Jens Paetzold

Publication year - 2009

Publication title -

investigative ophthalmology and visual science

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.935

H-Index - 218

eISSN - 1552-5783

pISSN - 0146-0404

DOI - 10.1167/iovs.08-2229

Subject(s) - thresholding , glaucoma , standard deviation , medicine , mathematics , statistics , ophthalmology , computer science , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics)

A new, fast-threshold strategy, German Adaptive Thresholding Estimation (GATE/GATE-i), is compared to the full-threshold (FT) staircase and the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard strategies. GATE-i is performed in the initial examination and GATE refers to the results in subsequent examinations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research